Paper detail

An Abstract Factorization Theorem and Some Applications

We combine the language of monoids with the language of preorders so as to refine some fundamental aspects of the classical theory of factorization and prove an abstract factorization theorem with a variety of applications. In particular, we obtain a generalization, from cancellative to Dedekind-finite (commutative or non-commutative) monoids, of a classical theorem on "atomic factorizations" that traces back to the work of P.M. Cohn in the 1960s; recover a theorem of D.D. Anderson and S. Valdes-Leon on "irreducible factorizations" in commutative rings; improve on a theorem of A.A. Antoniou and the author that characterizes atomicity in certain "monoids of sets" naturally arising from additive number theory and arithmetic combinatorics; and give a monoid-theoretic proof that every module of finite uniform dimension over a (commutative or non-commutative) ring $R$ is a direct sum of finitely many indecomposable modules (this is in fact a special case of a more general decomposition theorem for the objects of certain categories with finite products, where the indecomposable $R$-modules are characterized as the atoms of a suitable "monoid of modules").

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.