Paper detail

An a posteriori error analysis for an optimal control problem involving the fractional Laplacian

In a previous work, we introduced a discretization scheme for a constrained optimal control problem involving the fractional Laplacian. For such a control problem, we derived optimal a priori error estimates that demand the convexity of the domain and some compatibility conditions on the data. To relax such restrictions, in this paper, we introduce and analyze an efficient and, under certain assumptions, reliable a posteriori error estimator. We realize the fractional Laplacian as the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for a nonuniformly elliptic problem posed on a semi--infinite cylinder in one more spatial dimension. This extra dimension further motivates the design of an posteriori error indicator. The latter is defined as the sum of three contributions, which come from the discretization of the state and adjoint equations and the control variable. The indicator for the state and adjoint equations relies on an anisotropic error estimator in Muckenhoupt weighted Sobolev spaces. The analysis is valid in any dimension. On the basis of the devised a posteriori error estimator, we design a simple adaptive strategy that exhibits optimal experimental rates of convergence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.