Paper detail

An 8 hour characteristic time-scale in submillimetre light curves of Sagittarius A*

We compile and analyse long term (~10 year) submillimetre (1.3, 0.87, 0.43 mm, submm) wavelength light curves of the Galactic centre black hole, Sagittarius A*. The 0.87 and 0.43 mm data are taken from the literature, while the majority of the 1.3 mm light curve is from previously unpublished SMA and CARMA data. We use Monte Carlo simulations to show that on minute to few hour time-scales the variability is consistent with a red noise process with a 230 GHz power spectrum slope of 2.3+0.8-0.6 at 95% confidence. The light curve is de-correlated (white noise) on very long (month to year) times. In order to identify the transition time between red and white noise, we model the light curves as a stochastic damped random walk process. The models allow a quantitative estimate of this physical characteristic time-scale of 8-4+3 hours at 230 GHz at 95% confidence, with consistent results at 345 and 690 GHz. This corresponds to ~10 orbital times or ~1 inflow (viscous) time at R = 3 Rs, a typical radius producing the 230 GHz emission as measured by very long baseline interferometry and found in theoretical accretion flow and jet models. This time-scale is significantly shorter (longer) than those measured at radio (near-infrared, NIR) wavelengths, and is marginally inconsistent with the same variability mechanism operating in the submm and NIR for the expected t ~ R^3/2 scaling. It is crudely consistent with the analogous time-scale inferred in studies of quasar optical light curves after accounting for the difference in emission radius. We find evidence that the submm variability persists at least down to the ISCO, if not the event horizon. These results can be compared quantitatively with similar analyses at different wavebands to test for connections between the variability mechanisms, and with light curves from theoretical models of accreting black holes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.