Paper detail

Amino Acids in Comets and Meteorites: Stability under Gamma Radiation and Preservation of Chirality

Amino acids in solar system bodies may have played a key role in the chemistry that led to the origin of life on Earth. We present laboratory studies testing the stability of amino acids against gamma radiation photolysis. All the 20 chiral amino acids in the levo form used in the proteins of the current terrestrial biochemistry have been irradiated in the solid state with gamma radiation to a dose of 3.2 MGy which is the dose equivalent to that derived by radionuclide decay in comets and asteroids in 1.05x109 years. For each amino acid the radiolysis degree and the radioracemization degree was measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and by optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) spectroscopy. From these measurements a radiolysis rate constant kdsc and a radioracemization rate constant krac have been determined for each amino acid and extrapolated to a dose of 14 MGy which corresponds to the expected total dose delivered by the natural radionuclides decay to all the organic molecules present in comets and asteroids in 4.6x109 years, the age of the Solar System. It is shown that all the amino acids studied can survive a radiation dose of 14 MGy in significant quantity although part of them are lost in radiolytic processes. Similarly, also the radioracemization process accompanying the radiolysis does not extinguish the chirality. The knowledge of the radiolysis and radioracemization rate constants may permit the calculation of the original concentration of the amino acids at the times of the formation of the Solar System starting from the concentration found today in carbonaceous chondrites. For some amino acids the concentration in the presolar nebula could have been up to 6 times higher than currently observed in meteorites.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.