Paper detail

Aluminum lactate role in improving hydration and drying behavior of MgO-bonded refractory castables

Developing MgO-bonded castables is still an important subject for refractory producers and end-users based on the expansive character of the in-situ Mg(OH)2 formation. Considering that magnesia undergoes hydration when exposed to water and the generated hydrated phase needs to be properly accommodated in the resulting microstructure to inhibit the generation of cracks, it is very important to find out alternatives to control the MgO hydration reaction rate. This research investigated the use of aluminum lactate (AL) as a likely additive to change the hydration and drying behavior of vibratable castables bonded with different MgO sources (dead burnt, caustic or fumed one). Firstly, XRD, TG and DSC measurements of magnesia-based aqueous suspensions were evaluated to identify the AL effect on changing the hydration reaction products during the curing and drying steps. After that, Al2O3-MgO refractories were prepared and their flowability, curing behavior, cold flexural strength, apparent porosity, permeability and explosion resistance were evaluated. The results indicated that, instead of Mg(OH)2, Mg6Al2(OH)16(OH)2.4.5H2O/ Mg6Al2(OH)16(CO3).4H2O was the main hydrated phase identified in the AL-containing compositions. Due to this change in the hydration behavior of the refractories, the mixtures prepared with dead-burnt or magnesia fumes plus organic salt presented a longer setting time. Besides that, crack-free samples with improved permeability and green mechanical strength could be obtained when adding 0.5 wt.% or 1.0 wt.% of aluminum lactate to the tested castable compositions. Consequently, 1.0 wt.% of the selected additive favored the design of refractories with enhanced properties and greater spalling resistance, as no explosion could be observed even when subjecting the prepared samples to severe heating conditions (20C/min).

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.