Paper detail

Aluminium-26 from massive binary stars II. Rotating single stars up to core-collapse and their impact on the early Solar System

Radioactive nuclei were present in the early Solar System, as inferred from analysis of meteorites. Many are produced in massive stars, either during their lives or their final explosions. In the first paper in this series (Brinkman et al. 2019), we focused on the production of $^{26}$Al in massive binaries. Here, we focus on the production of another two short-lived radioactive nuclei, $^{36}$Cl and $^{41}$Ca, and the comparison to the early Solar System data. We used the MESA stellar evolution code with an extended nuclear network and computed massive (10-80 M$ _{\odot} $), rotating (with initial velocities of 150 and 300 km/s) and non-rotating single stars at solar metallicity (Z=0.014) up to the onset of core collapse. We present the wind yields for the radioactive isotopes $^{26}$Al, $^{36}$Cl, and $^{41}$Ca, and the stable isotopes $^{19}$F and $^{20}$Ne. In relation to the stable isotopes, we find that only the most massive models, $\geq$ 60M$_{\odot}$ and $\geq$ 40M$_{\odot}$ give positive $^{19}$F and $^{20}$Ne yields, respectively, depending on the initial rotation rate. In relation to the radioactive isotopes, we find that the early Solar System abundances of $^{26}$Al and $^{41}$Ca can be matched with by models with initial masses $\geq$40M$_{\odot}$, while $^{36}$Cl is matched only by our most massive models, $\geq$60M$_{\odot}$. $^{60}$Fe is not significantly produced by any wind model, as required by the observations. Therefore, massive star winds are a favoured candidate for the origin of the very short-lived $^{26}$Al, $^{36}$Cl, and $^{41}$Ca in the early Solar System.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.