Paper detail

Alternating Minimization, Proximal Minimization and Optimization Transfer Are Equivalent

We show that proximal minimization algorithms (PMA), majorization minimization (MM), and alternating minimization (AM) are equivalent. Each type of algorithm leads to a decreasing sequence of objective function. New conditions on PMA are given (the limit of the decreasing sequence of objective function is indeed the infimum of the objective function), which lead to new conditions on AM for the sequence Phi to converge to its infimum. These conditions can then be translated into the language of MM. Examples are given of each type of algorithm and some open questions are posed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.