Paper detail

Alternating Least Squares Tensor Completion in The TT-Format

We consider the problem of fitting a low rank tensor $A\in\mathbb{R}^{\mathcal I}$, ${\mathcal I} = \{1,\ldots,n\}^{d}$, to a given set of data points $\{M_i\in\mathbb{R}\mid i\in P\}$, $P\subset{\mathcal I}$. The low rank format under consideration is the hierarchical or TT or MPS format. It is characterized by rank bounds $r$ on certain matricizations of the tensor. The number of degrees of freedom is in ${\cal O}(r^2dn)$. For a fixed rank and mode size $n$ we observe that it is possible to reconstruct random (but rank structured) tensors as well as certain discretized multivariate (but rank structured) functions from a number of samples that is in ${\cal O}(\log N)$ for a tensor having $N=n^d$ entries. We compare an alternating least squares fit (ALS) to an overrelaxation scheme inspired by the LMaFit method for matrix completion. Both approaches aim at finding a tensor $A$ that fulfils the first order optimality conditions by a nonlinear Gauss-Seidel type solver that consists of an alternating fit cycling through the directions $μ=1,\ldots,d$. The least squares fit is of complexity ${\cal O}(r^4d\#P)$ per step, whereas each step of ADF is in ${\cal O}(r^2d\#P)$, albeit with a slightly higher number of necessary steps. In the numerical experiments we observe robustness of the completion algorithm with respect to noise and good reconstruction capability. Our tests provide evidence that the algorithm is suitable in higher dimension ($>$10) as well as for moderate ranks. Keywords: MPS, Tensor Completion, Tensor Train, TT, Hierarchical Tucker, HT, ALS.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.