Paper detail

Almost Tight Bounds for Conflict-Free Chromatic Guarding of Orthogonal Galleries

We address recently proposed chromatic versions of the classic Art Gallery Problem. Assume a simple polygon $P$ is guarded by a finite set of point guards and each guard is assigned one of $t$ colors. Such a chromatic guarding is said to be conflict-free if each point $p\in P$ sees at least one guard with a unique color among all guards visible from $p$. The goal is to establish bounds on the function $χ_{cf}(n)$ of the number of colors sufficient to guarantee the existence of a conflict-free chromatic guarding for any $n$-vertex polygon. Bärtschi and Suri showed $χ_{cf}(n)\in O(\log n)$ (Algorithmica, 2014) for simple orthogonal polygons and the same bound applies to general simple polygons (Bärtschi et al., SoCG 2014). In this paper, we assume the r-visibility model instead of standard line visibility. Points $p$ and $q$ in an orthogonal polygon are r-visible to each other if the rectangle spanned by the points is contained in $P$. For this model we show $χ_{cf}(n)\in O(\log\log n)$ and $χ_{cf}(n)\in Ω(\log\log n /\log\log\log n)$. Most interestingly, we can show that the lower bound proof extends to guards with line visibility. To this end we introduce and utilize a novel discrete combinatorial structure called multicolor tableau. This is the first non-trivial lower bound for this problem setting.Furthermore, for the strong chromatic version of the problem, where all guards r-visible from a point must have distinct colors, we prove a $Θ(\log n)$-bound. Our results can be interpreted as coloring results for special geometric hypergraphs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.