Paper detail

Almost optimal sparsification of random geometric graphs

A random geometric irrigation graph $Γ_n(r_n,ξ)$ has $n$ vertices identified by $n$ independent uniformly distributed points $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ in the unit square $[0,1]^2$. Each point $X_i$ selects $ξ_i$ neighbors at random, without replacement, among those points $X_j$ ($j\neq i$) for which $\|X_i-X_j\| < r_n$, and the selected vertices are connected to $X_i$ by an edge. The number $ξ_i$ of the neighbors is an integer-valued random variable, chosen independently with identical distribution for each $X_i$ such that $ξ_i$ satisfies $1\le ξ_i \le κ$ for a constant $κ>1$. We prove that when $r_n = γ_n \sqrt{\log n/n}$ for $γ_n \to \infty$ with $γ_n =o(n^{1/6}/\log^{5/6}n)$, then the random geometric irrigation graph experiences explosive percolation in the sense that when $\mathbf E ξ_i=1$, then the largest connected component has size $o(n)$ but if $\mathbf E ξ_i >1$, then the size of the largest connected component is with high probability $n-o(n)$. This offers a natural non-centralized sparsification of a random geometric graph that is mostly connected.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.