Paper detail

Almost Dedekind domains without radical factorization

We study almost Dedekind domains with respect to the failure of ideals to have radical factorization, that is, we study how to measure how far an almost Dedekind domain is from being an SP-domain. To do so, we consider the maximal space $\mathcal{M}=\mathrm{Max}(R)$ of an almost Dedekind domain $R$, interpreting its (fractional) ideals as maps from $\mathcal{M}$ to $\mathbb{Z}$, and looking at the continuity of these maps when $\mathcal{M}$ is endowed with the inverse topology and $\mathbb{Z}$ with the discrete topology. We generalize the concept of critical ideals by introducing a well-ordered chain of closed subsets of $\mathcal{M}$ (of which the set of critical ideals is the first step) and use it to define the class of \emph{SP-scattered domains}, which includes the almost Dedekind domains such that $\mathcal{M}$ is scattered and, in particular, the almost Dedekind domains such that $\mathcal{M}$ is countable. We show that for this class of rings the group $\mathrm{Inv}(R)$ is free by expressing it as a direct sum of groups of continuous maps, and that, for every length function $\ell$ on $R$ and every ideal $I$ of $R$, the length of $R/I$ is equal to the length of $R/\mathrm{rad}(I)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.