Paper detail

ALMA Observations of Atomic Carbon [C I] (${^3\mathrm{P}}_1\rightarrow{^3\mathrm{P}}_0$) and Low-$J$ CO Lines in the Starburst Galaxy NGC 1808

We present [C I] (${^3\mathrm{P}}_1\rightarrow{^3\mathrm{P}}_0$), $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, and C$^{18}$O ($J=2\rightarrow1$) observations of the central region (radius 1 kpc) of the starburst galaxy NGC 1808 at 30-50 pc resolution conducted with Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. Radiative transfer analysis of multiline data indicates warm ($T_\mathrm{k}\sim40\mathrm{-}80$ K) and dense ($n_\mathrm{H_2}\sim10^{3\mathrm{-}4}$ cm$^{-3}$) molecular gas with high column density of atomic carbon ($N_\mathrm{CI}\sim3\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$) in the circumnuclear disk (central 100 pc). The C I/H$_2$ abundance in the central 1 kpc is $\sim3-7\times10^{-5}$, consistent with the values in luminous infrared galaxies. The intensity ratios of [C I]/CO(1-0) and [C I]/CO(3-2), respectively, decrease and increase with radius in the central 1 kpc, whereas [C I]/CO(2-1) is uniform within statistical errors. The result can be explained by excitation and optical depth effects, since the effective critical density of CO (2-1) is comparable to that of [C I]. The distribution of [C I] is similar to that of $^{13}$CO (2-1), and the ratios of [C I] to $^{13}$CO (2-1) and C$^{18}$O (2-1) are uniform within $\sim30\%$ in the central $<400$ pc starburst disk. The results suggest that [C I] (${^3\mathrm{P}}_1\rightarrow{^3\mathrm{P}}_0$) luminosity can be used as a CO-equivalent tracer of molecular gas mass, although caution is needed when applied in resolved starburst nuclei (e.g., circumnuclear disk), where the [C I]/CO(1-0) luminosity ratio is enhanced due to high excitation and atomic carbon abundance. The [C I]/CO(1-0) intensity ratio toward the base of the starburst-driven outflow is $\lesssim0.15$, and the upper limits of the mass and kinetic energy of the atomic carbon outflow are $\sim1\times10^4~M_\odot$ and $\sim3\times10^{51}$ erg, respectively.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.