Paper detail

ALMA and high redshift dusty starburst mergers

By using a new numerical code for deriving the spectral energy distributions of galaxies, we have investigated the time evolution of morphological properties, the star formation rate, and the submillimeter flux at 850 $μ$m in high-redshift ($z$) dusty starburst mergers with mass ratio ($m_{2}$) of two disks ranging from 0.1 (minor merger) to 1.0 (major one). We found that the maximum star-formation rate, the degree of dust extinction, and the 850 $μ$m flux are larger for mergers with larger $m_{2}$. The 850 $μ$m flux from mergers at 1.5 $\le z \le$ 3.0 in the observer frame is found to be a few mJy for major merger cases, and at most $\sim$ 100 $μ$Jy for minor ones. This result suggests that only high-redshift major mergers are now detected by SCUBA with the current 850 $μm$ detection limit of a few mJy. These results imply that LMSA (ALMA) with the expected detection limit of the order of 10 $μ$Jy at 850 $μm$ can be used to study high-redshift mergers with variously different $m_2$, and thus provide an important clue to the formation of galaxies in a high-redshift universe.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.