Paper detail

Alleviating the tension at low multipole through Axion Monodromy

There exists some tension on large scales between the Planck data and the LCDM concordance model of the Universe, which has been amplified by the recently claimed discovery of non-zero tensor to scalar ratio $r$. At the same time, the current best-fit value of $r$ suggests large field inflation delta phi>M_p, which requires a UV complete description of inflation. A very promising working example that predicts large tensor modes and can be UV completed is axion monodromy inflation. This realization of inflation naturally produces oscillating features, as consequence of a broken shift symmetry. We analyse a combination of Planck, ACT, SPT, WMAP low l polarization and BICEP2 data, and show a long wavelength feature from a periodic potential can alleviate the tension at low multipoles with an improvement delta chi^2 ~2.5-4 per degree of freedom, depending on the level of foreground subtraction. As with an introduction of running, one expects that any scale dependence should lead to a worsened fit at high multipoles. We show that the logarithmic nature of the axion feature in combination with a tilt n_s~1 allows the fit to be identical to a no feature model at the 2 percent level on scales 100 =< l =<3500, and quite remarkable actually slightly improves the fit at scales l >2000. We also consider possible unremoved dust foregrounds and show that including these hardly changes the best-fit parameters. Our analysis suggests an axion decay constant of f/M_p ~O(.01). We discuss how Planck measurements of the TE and EE spectra can further constrain axion monodromy inflation with such a large feature. A measurement of the large scale structure power spectrum is even more promising, as the effect is much bigger since the tensor modes do not affect the large scales. At the same time, a feature could also lead to a lower sigma8, lifting the tension between CMB and SZ constraints on sigma8.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.