Paper detail

Aligned Image Sets under Channel Uncertainty: Settling a Conjecture by Lapidoth, Shamai and Wigger on the Collapse of Degrees of Freedom under Finite Precision CSIT

A conjecture made by Lapidoth, Shamai and Wigger at Allerton 2005 (also an open problem presented at ITA 2006) states that the DoF of a 2 user broadcast channel, where the transmitter is equipped with 2 antennas and each user is equipped with 1 antenna, must collapse under finite precision CSIT. In this work we prove that the conjecture is true in all non-degenerate settings (e.g., where the probability density function of unknown channel coefficients exists and is bounded). The DoF collapse even when perfect channel knowledge for one user is available to the transmitter. This also settles a related recent conjecture by Tandon et al. The key to our proof is a bound on the number of codewords that can cast the same image (within noise distortion) at the undesired receiver whose channel is subject to finite precision CSIT, while remaining resolvable at the desired receiver whose channel is precisely known by the transmitter. We are also able to generalize the result along two directions. First, if the peak of the probability density function is allowed to scale as O(P^(α/2)), representing the concentration of probability density (improving CSIT) due to, e.g., quantized feedback at rate (α/2)\log(P), then the DoF are bounded above by 1+α, which is also achievable under quantized feedback. Second, we generalize the result to the K user broadcast channel with K antennas at the transmitter and a single antenna at each receiver. Here also the DoF collapse under non-degenerate channel uncertainty. The result directly implies a collapse of DoF to unity under non-degenerate channel uncertainty for the general K-user interference and MxN user X networks as well.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.