Paper detail

Algorithms for Testing Monomials in Multivariate Polynomials

This paper is our second step towards developing a theory of testing monomials in multivariate polynomials. The central question is to ask whether a polynomial represented by an arithmetic circuit has some types of monomials in its sum-product expansion. The complexity aspects of this problem and its variants have been investigated in our first paper by Chen and Fu (2010), laying a foundation for further study. In this paper, we present two pairs of algorithms. First, we prove that there is a randomized $O^*(p^k)$ time algorithm for testing $p$-monomials in an $n$-variate polynomial of degree $k$ represented by an arithmetic circuit, while a deterministic $O^*(6.4^k + p^k)$ time algorithm is devised when the circuit is a formula, here $p$ is a given prime number. Second, we present a deterministic $O^*(2^k)$ time algorithm for testing multilinear monomials in $Π_mΣ_2Π_t\times Π_kΠ_3$ polynomials, while a randomized $O^*(1.5^k)$ algorithm is given for these polynomials. The first algorithm extends the recent work by Koutis (2008) and Williams (2009) on testing multilinear monomials. Group algebra is exploited in the algorithm designs, in corporation with the randomized polynomial identity testing over a finite field by Agrawal and Biswas (2003), the deterministic noncommunicative polynomial identity testing by Raz and Shpilka (2005) and the perfect hashing functions by Chen {\em at el.} (2007). Finally, we prove that testing some special types of multilinear monomial is W[1]-hard, giving evidence that testing for specific monomials is not fixed-parameter tractable.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.