Paper detail

Algorithms for hard-constraint point processes via discretization

We study algorithmic applications of a natural discretization for the hard-sphere model and the Widom-Rowlinson model in a region $\mathbb{V}\subset\mathbb{R}^d$. These models are used in statistical physics to describe mixtures of one or multiple particle types subjected to hard-core interactions. For each type, particles follow a Poisson point process with a type specific activity parameter (fugacity). The Gibbs distribution is characterized by the mixture of these point processes conditioned that no two particles are closer than a type-dependent distance threshold. A key part in better understanding the Gibbs distribution is its normalizing constant, called partition function. We give sufficient conditions that the partition function of a discrete hard-core model on a geometric graph based on a point set $X \subset \mathbb{V}$ closely approximates those of such continuous models. Previously, this was only shown for the hard-sphere model on cubic regions $\mathbb{V}=[0, \ell)^d$ when $X$ is exponential in the volume of the region $ν(\mathbb{V})$, limiting algorithmic applications. In the same setting, our refined analysis only requires a quadratic number of points, which we argue to be tight. We use our improved discretization results to approximate the partition functions of the hard-sphere model and the Widom-Rowlinson efficiently in $ν(\mathbb{V})$. For the hard-sphere model, we obtain the first quasi-polynomial deterministic approximation algorithm for the entire fugacity regime for which, so far, only randomized approximations are known. Furthermore, we simplify a recently introduced fully polynomial randomized approximation algorithm. Similarly, we obtain the best known deterministic and randomized approximation bounds for the Widom-Rowlinson model. Moreover, we obtain approximate sampling algorithms for the respective spin systems within the same fugacity regimes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.