Algorithmic aspects of disjunctive domination in graphs

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

For a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a set D⊆VD\subseteq V is called a \emph{disjunctive dominating set} of GG if for every vertex v∈V∖Dv\in V\setminus D, vv is either adjacent to a vertex of DD or has at least two vertices in DD at distance 22 from it. The cardinality of a minimum disjunctive dominating set of GG is called the \emph{disjunctive domination number} of graph GG, and is denoted by γ2d(G)γ_{2}^{d}(G). The \textsc{Minimum Disjunctive Domination Problem} (MDDP) is to find a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality γ2d(G)γ_{2}^{d}(G). Given a positive integer kk and a graph GG, the \textsc{Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem} (DDDP) is to decide whether GG has a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most kk. In this article, we first propose a linear time algorithm for MDDP in proper interval graphs. Next we tighten the NP-completeness of DDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a (ln⁡(Δ2+Δ+2)+1)(\ln(Δ^{2}+Δ+2)+1)-approximation algorithm for MDDP in general graphs and prove that MDDP can not be approximated within (1−ε)ln⁡(∣V∣)(1-ε) \ln(|V|) for any ε>0ε>0 unless NP ⊆\subseteq DTIME(∣V∣O(log⁡log⁡∣V∣))(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)}). Finally, we show that MDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 33.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.