Paper detail

Algorithmic Aspects of 2-Secure Domination in Graphs

Let $G(V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A dominating set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called a $2$-\textit{secure dominating set} ($2$-SDS) in $G$, if for every pair of distinct vertices $u_1,u_2 \in V(G)$ there exists a pair of distinct vertices $v_1,v_2 \in S$ such that $v_1 \in N[u_1]$, $v_2 \in N[u_2]$ and $(S \setminus \{v_1,v_2\}) \cup \{u_1,u_2 \}$ is a dominating set in $G$. The $2$\textit{-secure domination number} denoted by $γ_{2s}(G)$, equals the minimum cardinality of a $2$-SDS in $G$. Given a graph $ G$ and a positive integer $ k,$ the $ 2 $-Secure Domination ($ 2 $-SDM) problem is to check whether $ G $ has a $ 2 $-secure dominating set of size at most $ k.$ It is known that $ 2 $-SDM is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we prove that the $ 2 $-SDM problem is NP-complete for planar graphs and doubly chordal graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. We strengthen the NP-complete result for bipartite graphs, by proving this problem is NP-complete for some subclasses of bipartite graphs namely, star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite graphs. We prove that $ 2 $-SDM is linear time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs. We also show that the $ 2 $-SDM is W[2]-hard even for split graphs. The Minimum $ 2 $-Secure Dominating Set (M2SDS) problem is to find a $ 2 $-secure dominating set of minimum size in the input graph. We propose a $ Δ(G)+1 $ $ - $ approximation algorithm for M2SDS, where $ Δ(G) $ is the maximum degree of the input graph $ G $ and prove that M2SDS cannot be approximated within $ (1 - ε) \ln(| V | ) $ for any $ ε> 0 $ unless $ NP \subseteq DTIME(| V |^{ O(\log \log | V | )}) $. % even for bipartite graphs. A secure dominating set of a graph \textit{defends} one attack at any vertex of the graph. Finally, we show that the M2SDS is APX-complete for graphs with $Δ(G)=4.$

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.