Paper detail

Algebraic error analysis for mixed-precision multigrid solvers

This paper establishes the first theoretical framework for analyzing the rounding-error effects on multigrid methods using mixed-precision iterative-refinement solvers. While motivated by the sparse symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix equations that arise from discretizing linear elliptic PDEs, the framework is purely algebraic such that it applies to matrices that do not necessarily come from the continuum. Based on the so-called energy or $A$ norm, which is the natural norm for many problems involving SPD matrices, we provide a normwise forward error analysis, and introduce the notion of progressive precision for multigrid solvers. Each level of the multigrid hierarchy uses three different precisions that each increase with the fineness of the level, but at different rates, thereby ensuring that the bulk of the computation uses the lowest possible precision. The theoretical results developed here in the energy norm differ notably from previous theory based on the Euclidean norm in important ways. In particular, we show that simply rounding an exact result to finite precision causes an error in the energy norm that is proportional to the square root of $κ$, the associated matrix condition number. (By contrast, this error is of order $1$ when measured in the Euclidean norm.) Given this observation, we show that the limiting accuracy for both V-cycles and full multigrid is optimal in the sense that it is also proportional to $κ^{1/2}$ in energy. Additionally, we show that the loss of convergence rate due to rounding grows in proportion to $κ^{1/2}$, but argue that this loss is insignificant in practice. The theory presented here is the first forward error analysis in the energy norm of iterative refinement and the first rounding error analysis of multigrid in general.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.