Paper detail

Algebraic criteria for A-stability of peer two-step methods

A new criterion for A-stability of peer two-step methods is presented which is verifiable exactly in exact arithmetic by checking semi-definiteness of a certain test matrix. It depends on the existence of two positive definite weight matrices for a given method. Although the initial approach is different using properties of the numerical radius the criterion itself resembles the one from algebraic stability of General Linear Methods. Known numerical algorithms for the computation of the unknown weight matrices suffer from rank deficiencies of the test matrix. For $s$-stage peer methods of order $s-1$ this rank defect is identified with an explicit block diagonal decomposition of the test matrix in trivial and definite blocks. In the design of methods its coefficients are unknown and an explicit parametrization of A-stable peer methods of order $s-1$ is presented with a weight matrix as parameter. This leads to a general existence result for any number of stages. The restrictions for efficient L-stable peer methods like diagonally-implicit and parallel ones are also discussed and such methods with $3$ and $4$ stages are constructed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.