Paper detail

Alfven Wave-Driven Proto-Neutron Star Winds And R-Process Nucleosynthesis

We propose magnetic proto-neutron star (PNS) winds driven by \Alfven waves as well as the neutrino heating as an appropriate site for the r-process nucleosynthesis. \Alfven waves excited by surface motions of a PNS propagate outwardly, and they heat and accelerate the wind by dissipation. Compared with the wind purely driven by the neutrino heating, larger entropy per baryon and shorter dynamical time scale are achieved, which favors the r-process. We study reasonable cases that a wave amplitude is 10% of \Alfven speed at the surface to find that a PNS with surface field strength, $\gtrsim 5\times 10^{14}$G, gives suitable wind properties for the r-process, provided that dissipation length of the wave is at most $\sim$ 10 times of the PNS radius. We also compare properties of transcritical and subcritical winds in light of the r-process. We finally discuss possibilities of detections of $γ$-rays from radioactive nuclei and absorption lines due to Ba in supernova remnants which possess magnetars.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.