Paper detail

Alberg and Miller Reply to arXiv:arXiv:1206.3671

In a recent Comment [arXiv:1206.3671] on our calculation of the pion contributions to the self-energy of the nucleon [arXiv:1201.4184], Ji, Melnitchouk and Thomas (JMT) correctly state that we obtain the same result as given by the pseudovector (PV) theory. We point out that this result is expected by the equivalence theorem, since our pion-nucleon effective theory puts the intermediate nucleon on its mass shell. We make no claim that pseudoscalar (PS) and pseudovector interactions are equivalent in general. JMT also argue that our theory will not give the correct PV result for the pion momentum distribution $f^N_π$. We note that the discrepancies are much smaller than the uncertainties due to $πN$ form factors. To summarize, nothing in the Comment by JMT changes the conclusions or numerical results of our work in any substantive way.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.