Paper detail

AKARI Observations of Brown Dwarfs I.: CO and CO_2 Bands in the Near-Infrared Spectra

Near-infrared medium-resolution spectra of seven bright brown dwarfs are presented. The spectra were obtained with the Infrared Camera (IRC) on board the infrared astronomical satellite AKARI, covering 2.5--5.0 um with a spectral resolution of approximately 120. The spectral types of the objects range from L5 to T8, and enable us to study the spectral evolution of brown dwarfs. The observed spectra are in general consistent with the predictions from the previous observations and photospheric models. We find that the CO fundamental band around 4.6 um is clearly seen even in the T8 dwarf 2MASS J041519-0935, confirming the presence of non-equilibrium chemical state in the atmosphere. We also identify the CO_2 fundamental stretching-mode band at 4.2 um for the first time in the spectra of late-L and T-type brown dwarfs. We analyze the observed spectra by comparing with the predicted ones based on the Unified Cloudy Model (UCM). Although overall spectral energy distributions (SEDs) can be reasonably fitted with the UCM, observed CO and CO_2 bands in late-L and T-dwarfs are unexpectedly stronger than the model predictions assuming local thermodynamical equilibrium (LTE). We examine the vertical mixing model and find that this model explains the CO band at least partly in the T-dwarfs 2MASS J041519-0935 and 2MASS J055919-1404. The CO fundamental band also shows excess absorption against the predicted one in the L9 dwarf SDSS J083008+4828. Since CO is already highly abundant in the upper photospheres of late-L dwarfs, the extra CO by vertical mixing has little effect on the CO band strengths, and the vertical mixing model cannot be applied to this L-dwarf. A more serious problem is that the significant enhancement of the CO_2 4.2 um band in both the late-L and T dwarfs cannot be explained at all by the vertical mixing model. The enhancement of the CO_2 band remains puzzling.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.