Paper detail

AID: Accuracy Improvement of Analog Discharge-Based in-SRAM Multiplication Accelerator

This paper presents a novel circuit (AID) to improve the accuracy of an energy-efficient in-memory multiplier using a standard 6T-SRAM. The state-of-the-art discharge-based in-SRAM multiplication accelerators suffer from a non-linear behavior in their bit-line (BL, BLB) due to the quadratic nature of the access transistor that leads to a poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In order to achieve linearity in the BLB voltage, we propose a novel root function technique on the access transistor's gate that results in accuracy improvement of on average 10.77 dB SNR compared to state-of-the-art discharge-based topologies. Our analytical methods and a circuit simulation in a 65 nm CMOS technology verify that the proposed technique consumes 0.523 pJ per computation (multiplication, accumulation, and preset) from a power supply of 1V, which is 51.18% lower compared to other state-of-the-art techniques. We have performed an extensive Monte Carlo based simulation for a 4x4 multiplication operation, and our novel technique presents less than 0.086 standard deviations for the worst-case incorrect output scenario.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.