Paper detail

AI-based Approach for Safety Signals Detection from Social Networks: Application to the Levothyrox Scandal in 2017 on Doctissimo Forum

Social media can be an important source of information facilitating the detection of new safety signals in pharmacovigilance. Various approaches have investigated the analysis of social media data using AI such as NLP techniques for detecting adverse drug events. Existing approaches have focused on the extraction and identification of Adverse Drug Reactions, Drug-Drug Interactions and drug misuse. However, non of the works tackled the detection of potential safety signals by taking into account the evolution in time of relevant indicators. Moreover, despite the success of deep learning in various healthcare applications, it was not explored for this task. We propose an AI-based approach for the detection of potential pharmaceutical safety signals from patients' reviews that can be used as part of the pharmacovigilance surveillance process to flag the necessity of an in-depth pharmacovigilance investigation. We focus on the Levothyrox case in France which triggered huge attention from the media following the change of the medication formula, leading to an increase in the frequency of adverse drug reactions normally reported by patients. Our approach is two-fold. (1) We investigate various NLP-based indicators extracted from patients' reviews including words and n-grams frequency, semantic similarity, Adverse Drug Reactions mentions, and sentiment analysis. (2) We propose a deep learning architecture, named Word Cloud Convolutional Neural Network (WC-CNN) which trains a CNN on word clouds extracted from the patients comments. We study the effect of different time resolutions and different NLP pre-processing techniques on the model performance. Our results show that the proposed indicators could be used in the future to effectively detect new safety signals. The WC-CNN model trained on word clouds extracted at monthly resolution outperforms the others with an accuracy of 75%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.