Paper detail

AGN torus emission for a homogeneous sample of bright FSRQs

We have selected a complete sample of 80 flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) from the WMAP 7-yr catalog within the SDSS area, all with measured redshift, and have inspected their SEDs looking for evidence of an AGN torus emission. A SED fitting algorithm has found such evidence for seven objects and an uncertain indication for one more. These 8 FSRQs belong to the sub-sample of 55 sources showing the optical--ultraviolet bump interpreted as thermal emission from a standard accretion disc. Torus luminosities have been estimated for the eight objects whose torus was identified by the fitting algorithm. For the other 47 FSRQs in the sub-sample we have derived upper limits to the torus luminosity. Our analysis shows that the torus can show up clearly only under quite special conditions: low luminosity and preferentially low peak frequency of the beamed synchrotron emission from the jet; high torus luminosity, close to that of the accretion disc. This implies that the inferred ratios of torus to disc luminosity are biased high. The median value, considering upper limits as detections, is $L_{\rm torus}/L_{\rm disc}\sim 1$ while studies of radio quiet quasars yield average ratios $\langle L_{\rm torus}/L_{\rm disc}\rangle \simeq 1/3-1/2$. Our results are compatible with the FSRQ tori having the same properties of those of radio quiet quasars. At variance with Plotkin et al. (2012), who investigated a sample of optically selected BL Lacs, we find that the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) infrared colors do not allow us to draw any conclusion on the presence or absence of tori associated with WMAP selected blazars. With the latter selection blazars of all types (FSRQs with and without evidence of torus, BL Lacs, blazars of unknown type) occupy the same region of the WISE color-color plane, and their region overlaps that of SDSS quasars with point-like morphology.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.