Paper detail

AGN Selection Methods Have Profound Impacts on the Distributions of Host Galaxy Properties

We present a comparative study of X-ray and IR AGNs at $z\approx2$ to highlight the important AGN selection effects on the distributions of host galaxy properties. Compared with non-AGN star-forming galaxies (SFGs) on the main sequence, X-ray AGNs have similar median star formation (SF) properties, but their incidence (q$_{\rm{AGN}}$) is higher among galaxies with either enhanced or suppressed SF, and among galaxies with larger stellar mass surface density, regardless if it is measured within half-light radius ($Σ_e$) or central 1kpc ($Σ_{\rm{1kpc}}$). Unlike X-ray AGNs, IR AGNs are less massive, and have enhanced SF and similar distributions of colors, $Σ_e$ and $Σ_{\rm{1kpc}}$ relative to non-AGN SFGs. Given that $Σ_e$ and $Σ_{\rm{1kpc}}$ strongly correlate with M$_*$, we introduce the fractional mass within central 1kpc ($\rm{\frac{M_{1kpc}}{M_*}}$), which only weakly depends on M$_*$, to quantify galaxy compactness. Both AGN populations have similar $\rm{\frac{M_{1kpc}}{M_*}}$ distributions compared to non-AGN SFGs'. While q$_{\rm{AGN}}$ increases with $Σ_e$ and $Σ_{\rm{1kpc}}$, it remains constant with $\rm{\frac{M_{1kpc}}{M_*}}$, indicating that the trend of increasing q$_{\rm{AGN}}$ with $\rmΣ$ is driven by M$_*$ more than morphology. While our findings are not in conflict with the scenario of AGN quenching, they do not imply it either, because the incidence of AGNs hosted in transitional galaxies depends crucially on AGN selections. Additionally, despite the relatively large uncertainty of AGN bolometric luminosities, their very weak correlation, if any, with SF activities, regardless of AGN selections, also argues against a direct causal link between the presences of AGNs and the quenching of massive galaxies at $z\sim2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.