Paper detail

AGN jet power and feedback characterised by Bondi accretion in brightest cluster galaxies

(Abridged) We propose a new method to estimate the Bondi (hot gas) accretion rates, \dot M_B, onto the supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centres of elliptical galaxies. It can be applied even if the Bondi radius is not well-resolved in X-ray observations. This method is based on two simple assumptions: (1) hot gas outside the Bondi radius is in nearly a hydrostatic equilibrium, and (2) the gas temperature near the galaxy centre is close to the virial temperature. We apply this method to 28 bright elliptical galaxies in nearby galaxy clusters (27 of them are the brightest cluster galaxies; BCGs). We find a correlation between the Bondi accretion rates and the power of jets associated with the SMBHs over four orders of magnitude in \dot M_B. For most galaxies, the accretion rates are large enough to account for the jet powers. Our results indicate that the feedback from the active galactic nuclei (AGN) correlates with the properties of the hot gas surrounding the SMBHs. We also find that more massive SMBHs in BCGs tend to have larger specific growth rates. This may explain the hyper masses (~ 10^10 M_sun) of some of the SMBHs. Comparison between the accretion rates and the X-ray luminosities of the AGN suggests that the AGN in the BCGs are extremely radiatively inefficient compared with X-ray binaries in the Milky Way, even when their Eddington accretion ratio, \dot M_B/\dot M_Edd, exceeds 0.01. Lastly, we find a tight correlation between the Bondi accretion rates and the X-ray luminosities of cool cores. Their relation is linear and the power generated by the Bondi accretion is large enough to compensate the radiative cooling of the cool cores. Although the `classical' Bondi accretion model is a greatly oversimplified one, the correlations we find here demonstrate that the accretion onto the SMBHs reflects broadly the properties of the Bondi accretion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.