Paper detail

AGN feedback and entropy injection in galaxy cluster cores

The non-gravitational energy feedback is of crucial importance in modeling/simulating clusters to be used as cosmological probes. AGNs are, arguably, of primary importance in injecting energy in the cluster cores. We make the first estimate of non-gravitational energy {\it profiles} in galaxy cluster cores (and beyond) from observational data. Comparing the observed entropy profiles within $r_{500}$, from the Representative {\it XMM-Newton} Cluster Structure Survey (REXCESS), to simulated entropy profiles from both AMR and SPH non-radiative simulations, we estimate the amount of non-gravitational energy, $E_{\rm ICM}$, contained in the ICM. Adding the radiative losses we estimate the total energy feedback, $E_{\rm Feedback}$, into the clusters. The profiles for the energy deposition, $ΔE_{\rm ICM}(x)$, in the inner regions differ for Cool-Core (CC) and Non Cool-Core (NCC) clusters, decreasing after accounting for the radiative cooling. The total feedback energy scales with the mean spectroscopic temperature as $E_{\rm Feedback} \propto T_{\rm sp}^{2.52 \pm0.08}$ and $E_{\rm Feedback} \propto T_{\rm sp}^{2.17 \pm 0.11}$, when compared with the baseline SPH and AMR profiles respectively. The scatter in the two cases is 15% and 23%, respectively. The mean non-gravitational energy per particle within $r_{500}$, is $ε_{\rm ICM} = {2.8} \pm {0.8}$ keV for the SPH theoretical relation and $ε_{\rm ICM} = {1.7} \pm {0.9}$ keV for the AMR theoretical relation. We use the {\it NRAO/VLA Sky Survey} (NVSS) source catalog to determine the radio luminosity, $L_R$, at 1.4 GHz of the central source(s) of our sample. For $T_{\rm sp} > 3$ keV, the $E_{\rm Feedback}$ correlates with $L_R$. We show that AGNs could provide a significant component of the feedback. (Abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.