Paper detail

AGN dust tori: the X-ray-infrared connection

We have combined the CLASXS Chandra survey in Lockman with the Spitzer SWIRE survey data to study the X-ray-infrared connection for AGN. The sample consists of 401 X-ray-sources, of which 306 are detected by Spitzer, and a further 257 AGN candidates detected through their dust torus, but not by Chandra. For X-ray sources the X-ray hardness ratio has been modelled in terms of a power-law with absorption N(H). The optical and infrared data have been modelled in terms of our well-established optical galaxy and QSO templates, and infrared templates based on radiative transfer models. Our estimate of the N(H) distribution is consistent with other studies, but we do find a higher proportion of low absorption objects at z < 0.5 than at z > 0.5. While we find only one X-ray AGN with N(H) > 10^{24} cm^{-2}, we argue that 10 objects with torus luminosity apparently exceeding the bolometric X-ray to 3 μm luminosity are strong candidates for being heavily absorbed in X-rays. We also estimate that at least half of the infrared-detected AGN dust tori which are undetected in X-rays are likely to be Compton thick. Our estimate of the total number of Compton-thick objects corresponds to > 20%$ of the combined SWIRE-CLASXS sample (and with an upper limit of 39 %). The range of dust covering factors is 1-100 %, with a mean of 40 %, ie a Type 2 fraction of 40 %. Measured by the ratio of dust torus luminosity to X-ray or (for Type 1 objects) optical luminosity, the covering factor appears to decrease towards intermediate AGN luminosity, in contradiction to estimates based on ratios of narrow-line and broad-line spectra, but may increase again at low AGN luminosity.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.