Paper detail

Aging in Metropolis dynamics of the REM: a proof

We study the aging behavior of the Random Energy Model (REM) evolving under Metropolis dynamics. We prove that a classical two-time correlation function converges almost surely to the arcsine law distribution function that characterizes activated aging, as predicted in the physics literature, in the optimal domain of the time-scale and temperature parameters where this result can be expected to hold. In the course of the proof we establish that a certain continuous time clock process, after proper rescaling, converges almost surely to a stable subordinator, improving upon the result of Cerny and Wassmer (2015) where a closely related clock is shown to converge in probability only, and in a restricted region of the time-scale and temperature parameters. The random rescaling involved in this convergence is controlled at the fine level of fluctuations. As a byproduct, we refine and prove a conjecture made in Cerny and Wassmer (2015).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.