Paper detail

Aggregation dynamics of methacrylate binary and ternary biomimetic polymers in solution

Using detailed atomistic simulations,we explore the conformational landscape of aggregates formed by biomimetic antimicrobial(AM) binary methacrylate copolymers,with hydrophobic and charged functional groups and the role of inclusion of polar functional groups on such aggregate morphologies.The effect of sequence of the constituent functional groups on aggregate conformation is also studied by considering random and block sequences along the polymer backbone.Our results suggest that block binary copolymers form large spherical aggregates with effective shielding of hydrophobic groups by charged groups.In contrast, random binary copolymers tend to form more bundle-like structures with exposed hydrophobic groups.The strong aggregation of binary polymers is driven primarily by attractive interactions between hydrophobic groups.However,replacing some of the hydrophobic groups with overall charge neutral polar groups weakens the aggregate considerably, leading to increased conformational fluctuations and formation of loose-packed,open aggregates,particularly in case of random ternary polymers.Interaction energy calculations strongly suggest that the role of inclusion of polar groups is two-fold: (1)to reduce possible strong local concentration of hydrophobic groups and smear the hydrophobicity along the polymer backbone to increase the solubility of the polymers (2)to compensate the loss of attractive hydrophobic interactions by forming attractive electrostatic interactions with charged groups and contribute to aggregation formation,albeit weak.Given that most of the naturally occurring AM peptides have contributions from all the three functional groups,this study elucidates the functionally tuneable role of inclusion of polar groups in the way AM agents interact with each other in solution phase,which can eventually dictate their partitioning behavior into bacterial and mammalian membranes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.