Paper detail

Aggregate Queries on Knowledge Graphs: Fast Approximation with Semantic-aware Sampling

A knowledge graph (KG) manages large-scale and real-world facts as a big graph in a schema-flexible manner. Aggregate query is a fundamental query over KGs, e.g., "what is the average price of cars produced in Germany?". Despite its importance, answering aggregate queries on KGs has received little attention in the literature. Aggregate queries can be supported based on factoid queries, e.g., "find all cars produced in Germany", by applying an additional aggregate operation on factoid queries' answers. However, this straightforward method is challenging because both the accuracy and efficiency of factoid query processing will seriously impact the performance of aggregate queries. In this paper, we propose a "sampling-estimation" model to answer aggregate queries over KGs, which is the first work to provide an approximate aggregate result with an effective accuracy guarantee, and without relying on factoid queries. Specifically, we first present a semantic-aware sampling to collect a high-quality random sample through a random walk based on knowledge graph embedding. Then, we propose unbiased estimators for COUNT, SUM, and a consistent estimator for AVG to compute the approximate aggregate results based on the random sample, with an accuracy guarantee in the form of confidence interval. We extend our approach to support iterative improvement of accuracy, and more complex queries with filter, GROUP-BY, and different graph shapes, e.g., chain, cycle, star, flower. Extensive experiments over real-world KGs demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.