Paper detail

Aggregate dust model to study the polarization properties of comet C/1996 B2 Hyakutake

In our present study, the observed linear polarization data of comet Hyakutake are studied at wavelengths $λ=0.365μm$, $λ=0.485μm$ and 0.684$μm$ through simulations using Ballistic Particle-Cluster Aggregate and Ballistic Cluster-Cluster Aggregate aggregates of 128 spherical monomers. We first investigated that the size parameter of the monomer, $x$ $\sim$ 1.56 -- 1.70, turned out to be most suitable which provides the best fits to the observed dust scattering properties at three wavelengths $λ= 0.365$$μm$, 0.485$μm$ and 0.684$μm$. Thus the effective radius of the aggregate (r) lies in the range $0.45 μm \le r \le 0.49 μm$ at $λ= 0.365$$μm$; $ 0.60 μm \le r \le 0.66 μm$ at $λ= 0.485$$μm$ and $0.88 μm \le r \le 0.94 μm$ at $λ= 0.684$$μm$. Now using superposition \textsc{t-matrix} code and the power-law size distribution, $n(r) \sim r^{-3}$, the best-fitting values of complex refractive indices are calculated which can best fit the observed polarization data at the above three wavelengths. The best-fitting complex refractive indices $(n,k)$ are found to be (1.745, 0.095) at $λ= 0.365 $ $μm$, (1.743, 0.100) at $λ= 0.485 $ $μm$ and (1.695, 0.100) at $λ= 0.684$ $μm$. The refractive indices coming out from the present analysis correspond to mixture of both silicates and organics, which are in good agreement with the \textit{in situ} measurement of comets by different spacecraft.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.