Paper detail

Ages, metallicities and structure of stellar clusters in the Magellanic Bridge

The formation of the Magellanic Bridge during an encounter between the Magellanic Clouds $\sim$200 Myr ago would be imprinted in the chemical evolution and kinematics of its stellar population, with sites of active star formation. Since it contains hundreds of stellar clusters and associations, we combined deep photometry from VISCACHA and SMASH surveys to explore this topic, by deriving structural parameters, age, metallicity, distance and mass for 33 Bridge clusters with robust statistical tools. We identified a group of 13 clusters probably stripped from the Small Magellanic Cloud (0.5$-$6.8 Gyr, $\rm{[Fe/H]} < -0.6$ dex) and another 15 probably formed in-situ ($<$200 Myr, $\rm{[Fe/H]}\sim-0.4$ dex). Two metallicity dips were detected in the age-metallicity relation, coeval to the Stream and Bridge formation epochs. Cluster masses range from 500 to $\sim 10^4 M_\odot$, and a new estimate of $3-5\times 10^5 M_\odot$ is obtained for the Bridge stellar mass.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.