Paper detail

Age of Gossip in Ring Networks in the Presence of Jamming Attacks

We consider a system with a source which maintains the most current version of a file, and a ring network of $n$ user nodes that wish to acquire the latest version of the file. The source gets updated with newer file versions as a point process, and forwards them to the user nodes, which further forward them to their neighbors using a memoryless gossip protocol. We study the average version age of this network in the presence of $\tilde{n}$ jammers that disrupt inter-node communications. To this purpose, we construct an alternate system model of mini-rings and prove that the version age of the original model can be sandwiched between constant multiples of the version age of the alternate model. We show that when the number of jammers scales as a fractional power of the network size, i.e., $\tilde n= cn^α$, the version age scales as $\sqrt{n}$ when $α< \frac{1}{2}$, and as $n^α$ when $α\geq \frac{1}{2}$. As the version age of a ring network without any jammers scales as $\sqrt{n}$, our result implies that the version age with gossiping is robust against up to $\sqrt{n}$ jammers in a ring network.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.