Paper detail

Age and distance for the old open cluster NGC188 from the eclipsing binary member V12

We present time-series radial-velocity and photometric observations of a solar-type double-lined eclipsing binary star (V12) near the turnoff in the old open cluster NGC188. We use these data to determine the spectroscopic orbit and the photometric elements for V12. From our analysis we determine accurate masses (Mp=1.103+-0.007Msun, Ms=1.081+-0.007Msun) and radii (R =1.424+-0.019Rsun, Rs=1.373+-0.019Rsun) for the primary (p) and secondary (s) binary components. We adopt a reddening of E_(B-V)=0.087 for NGC188, and derive component effective temperatures of 5900+-100K and 5875+-100K, respectively, for the primary and secondary stars. From their absolute dimensions, the two components of V12 yield identical distance moduli of Vo-MV=11.24+-0.09, corresponding to 1770+-75pc. We determine an age of 6.2+-0.2Gyr for V12 and NGC188, from a comparison with theoretical isochrones in the mass-radius diagram. This age is independent of distance, reddening, and color-temperature transformations. We use isochrones from Victoria-Regina (VRSS) and Yonsei-Yale (Y2) with [Fe/H]=-0.1 and [Fe/H]=0.0. From the solar metallicity isochrones, an age of 6.4Gyr provides the best fit to the binary components for both sets of models. For the isochrones with [Fe/H]=-0.1, ages of 6.0Gyr and 5.9Gyr provide the best fits for the VRSS and Y2 models, respectively. We use the distance and age estimates for V12, together with best estimates for the metallicity and reddening of NGC188, to investigate the locations of the corresponding VRSS and Y2 isochrones relative to cluster members in the color-magnitude diagram. Plausible changes in model metallicity and distance to better match the isochrones to the cluster sequences, result in a range of ages for NGC188 that is more than 3 times that resulting from our analysis of V12.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.