Paper detail

Aeroacoustics of Twin Rectangular Jets Including Screech: Large-eddy Simulations with Experimental Validation

High-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) are performed to investigate aeroacoustic characteristics of jets issuing from twin rectangular nozzles with an aspect ratio of 2:1 at two over-expanded conditions and the design condition. For all three jet conditions simulated, LES predicts qualitatively similar near-field flow statistics to those measured at the University of Cincinnati. Using the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings method, LES captures the fundamental screech tone and its harmonics fairly well at multiple observer locations in the far-field. Intense jet flapping motions in the near-field along the minor axis, which are influenced by jet-to-jet interactions, are found to correspond to those frequencies. Moreover, the predicted overall sound pressure levels are within 1-2 dB of the experimental measurements. However, the screech tones appear to be intermittent, as the twin-jet interaction pattern varies irregularly. To extract dominant flow structures at the screech frequencies and identify the twin-jet coupling modes, spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) analysis is used. SPOD analysis recovers energetic peaks at the screech frequencies, and the corresponding leading modes indicate strong upstream radiation originating from the fifth/sixth shock-cells. For the two over-expanded conditions, the leading modes show anti-symmetric coupling in the minor axis at the fundamental screech frequencies. In contrast, the two jets behave symmetrically with respect to each other in the major axis, in line with the absence of jet flapping in this direction. Furthermore, the leading SPOD eigenvalues turn out to be, at least, two orders of magnitude larger than higher-order eigenvalues, suggesting potential of reduced-order models for the twin-jet screech.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.