Paper detail

Aeppli-Bott-Chern cohomology and Deligne cohomology from a viewpoint of Harvey-Lawson's spark complex

By comparing Deligne complex and Aeppli-Bott-Chern complex, we construct a differential cohomology $\widehat{H}^*(X, *, *)$ that plays the role of Harvey-Lawson spark group $\widehat{H}^*(X, *)$, and a cohomology $H^*_{ABC}(X; \Z(*, *))$ that plays the role of Deligne cohomology $H^*_{\mathcal{D}}(X; \Z(*))$ for every complex manifold $X$. They fit in the short exact sequence $$ 0\rightarrow H^{k+1}_{ABC}(X; \Z(p, q)) \rightarrow \widehat{H}^k(X, p, q) \overset{δ_1}{\rightarrow} Z^{k+1}_I(X, p, q) \rightarrow 0$$ and $\widehat{H}^{\bullet}(X, \bullet, \bullet)$ possess ring structure and refined Chern classes, acted by the complex conjugation, and if some primitive cohomology groups of $X$ vanish, there is a Lefschetz isomorphism. Furthermore, the ring structure of $H^{\bullet}_{ABC}(X; \Z(\bullet, \bullet))$ inherited from $\widehat{H}^{\bullet}(X, \bullet, \bullet)$ is compatible with the one of the analytic Deligne cohomology $H^{\bullet}(X; \Z(\bullet))$. We compute $\widehat{H}^*(X, *, *)$ for $X$ the Iwasawa manifold and its small deformations and get a refinement of the classification given by Nakamura.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.