Paper detail

Advancing quantitative understanding of self-potential signatures in the critical zone through long-term monitoring

The self-potential (SP) method is a passive geophysical technique, which may offer insights about water and ionic fluxes in the vadose zone. The main obstacles presently prohibiting its routine use in quantitative vadose zone hydrology are the superposition of signals arising from various source mechanisms, difficult-to-predict electrode polarization effects that depend on electrode design and age, as well as water saturation, pore water chemistry, clay content, and temperature in the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. We present a unique long-term SP monitoring experiment focusing on the first four years of data acquired at different depths in the vadose zone within the HOBE hydrological observatory in Denmark. Using state-of-the-art SP theory combined with flow and transport simulations, we attempt to replicate the observed data and suggest reasons for observed discrepancies. The predictions are overall satisfactory during the first six months of monitoring after which both the patterns and magnitudes of the observed data change drastically. Our main observations are (1) that predicted SP magnitudes are strongly sensitive to how the effective excess charge scales with water saturation implying that continued research is needed to build more accurate models of electrokinetic phenomena in unsaturated conditions, (2) that significant changes in electrode polarization occur in the shallowest electrodes at time scales of a year, suggesting that electrode effects cannot be ignored and that explicit electrode modeling should be considered in future monitoring studies, and (3) that multi-rate mass transfer and reactive transport modeling are needed to better predict salinity and pore water conductivity. We hope to stimulate other researchers to test new SP modeling approaches and interpretation strategies against these data by making the SP and complimentary data time-series available.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.