Paper detail

Advanced modeling for the HIT-SI Experiment

A two-temperature magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model, which evolves the electron and ion temperatures separately, is implemented in the PSI-Tet code and used to model plasma dynamics in the HIT-SI experiment. When compared with single-temperature Hall-MHD, the two-temperature Hall-MHD model demonstrates improved qualitative agreement with experimental measurements, including: far-infrared interferometry, ion Doppler spectroscopy, Thomson scattering, and magnetic probe measurements. The two-temperature model is utilized for HIT-SI simulations in both the PSI-Tet and NIMROD codes at a number of different injector frequencies in the 14.5-68.5 kHz range. At all frequencies the two-temperature models result in increased toroidal current, lower chord-averaged density, and symmetrization of the current centroid, relative to single-temperature simulations. Both codes produce higher average temperatures and toroidal currents as the injector frequency is increased. Power balance and heat fluxes to the wall are calculated for the two-temperature PSI-Tet model and indicate considerable viscous and compressive heating, particularly at high injector frequency. Parameter scans are also presented for the artificial diffusivity, and Dirichlet wall temperature and density. Artificial diffusivity and the density boundary condition both significantly modify the plasma density profiles, leading to larger average temperatures, higher toroidal current, and increased relative density fluctuations at low diffusivity and low wall density. High power, low density simulations at 14.5 kHz achieve sufficiently high gain (G = 5) to generate significant volumes of closed flux lasting 1-2 injector periods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.