Paper detail

Adsorption of CO$_2$ and CH$_4$ and their mixtures in gas hydrates

We report results from grand-canonical Monte Carlo simulations of methane and carbon dioxide adsorption in structure sI gas hydrates. Simulations of pure component systems show that all methane sites are equivalent, while carbon dioxide distinguishes between two types of sites, large or small. The adsorbed mixture can be regarded as ideal, as long as only large sites are occupied. A strong preference is demonstrated for methane, when the smaller sites become filled. The molar heat of adsorption of methane decreases with composition, while the molar heat of adsorption for carbon dioxide passes an extremum, essentially in accordance with the observation on the site sizes. The Helmholtz energies of the hydrate with CO$_2$-CH$_4$ gas mixture for temperatures between 278 and 328 K and pressures between 10$^4$ and 10$^9$ Pa indicate that certain mixtures are more stable than others. The results indicate that a thermodynamic path exists for conversion of a pure methane hydrate into a pure carbon dioxide hydrate without destroying the hydrate structure.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.