Paper detail

Adjusting for Treatment Effects in Studies of Quantitative Traits

A population-based study of a quantitative trait, e.g. Blood Pressure(BP) may be seriously compromised when the trait is subject to the effects of a treatment. Without appropriate corrections this can lead to considerable reduction of statistical power. Here we demonestrate this in the scenario of QTL mapping through Single-Marker Analysis. The data are simulated from a normal mixtrure for different values of allele frequencies, separation between normal populations and Linkage Disequilibrium, and several methods of correction are compared to check which can best compensate for the loss of power if treatment effects are ignored. In one of these methods, underlying BPs are approximated by subtracting an estimate of mean value of medicine effect from obsereved BPs in treated subjects. We domonestrate the efficacy of this method throughout different choices of parameters. Finally to account for quantitative traits that follow non-normal distributions, data are simulated from lognormal mixtures similarly and Kruskal-Wallis test is used to obtain estimates of powers for different methods of analysis.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.