Paper detail

Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Steady Char Burnout

Simulations of pulverised coal combustion rely on various models, required in order to correctly approximate the flow, chemical reactions, and behavior of solid particles. These models, in turn, rely on multiple model parameters, which are determined through experiments or small-scale simulations and contain a certain level of uncertainty. The competing effects of transport, particle physics, and chemistry give rise to various scales and disparate dynamics, making it a very challenging problem to analyse. Therefore, the steady combustion process of a single solid particle is considered as a starting point for this study. As an added complication, the large number of parameters present in such simulations makes a purely forward approach to sensitivity analysis very expensive and almost infeasible. Therefore, the use of adjoint-based algorithms, to identify and quantify the underlying sensitivities and uncertainties, is proposed. This adjoint framework bears a great advantage in this case, where a large input space is analysed, since a single forward and backward sweep provides sensitivity information with respect to all parameters of interest. In order to investigate the applicability of such methods, both discrete and continuous adjoints are considered, and compared to the conventional approaches, such as finite differences, and forward sensitivity analysis. Various quantities of interest are considered, and sensitivities with respect to the relevant combustion parameters are reported for two different freestream compositions, describing air and oxy-atmospheres. This study serves as a benchmark for future research, where unsteady and finally turbulent cases will be considered.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.