Paper detail

Adiabatic Perturbations in Homologous Conventional Polytropic Core Collapses of a Spherical Star

We perform a non-radial adiabatic perturbation analysis on homologous conventional polytropic stellar core collapses. The core collapse features a polytropic exponent $Γ=4/3$ relativistic gas under self-gravity of spherical symmetry while three-dimensional perturbations involve an adiabatic exponent $γ$ with $γ\neqΓ$ such that the Brunt-V$\ddot{\rm a}$is$\ddot{\rm a}$l$\ddot{\rm a}$ buoyancy frequency ${\cal N}$ does not vanish. With proper boundary conditions, we derive eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for different modes of oscillations. In reference to stellar oscillations and earlier results, we examine behaviours of different modes and the criterion for instabilities. The acoustic p$-$modes and surface f$-$modes remain stable. For $γ<Γ$, convective instabilities appear as unstable internal gravity g$^{-}-$modes. For $γ>Γ$, sufficiently low-order internal gravity g$^{+}-$modes are stable, whereas sufficiently high-order g$^{+}-$modes, which would have been stable in a static star, become unstable during self-similar core collapses. For supernova explosions, physical consequences of such inevitable g$-$mode instabilities are speculated.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.