Paper detail

Adhesive penetration in Beech wood Part II: Penetration Model

We propose an analytical model to predict the adhesives penetration into hard wood. Penetration of hard wood is dominated by the vessel network which prohibits porous medium approximations. Our model considers two scales: a one dimensional capillary fluid transport of a hardening adhesive through a single, straight vessel with diffusion of solvent through its walls and a mesoscopic scale based on topological characteristics of the vessel network, where results from the single vessel scale are mapped onto a periodic network. Given an initial amount of adhesive and applied bonding pressure, we calculate the portion of the filled structure. The model is applied to beech wood samples joined with three different types of adhesive (PUR, UF, PVAC) under various growth ring angles. We evaluate adhesive properties and bond line morphologies described in part I of this work. The model contains one free parameter that can be adjusted in order to fit the experimental data.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.