Paper detail

Adequacy of Approximations in GW Theory

We use an all-electron implementation of the GW approximation to analyze several possible sources of error in the theory and its implementation. Among these are convergence in the polarization and Green's functions, the dependence of QP levels on choice of basis sets, and differing approximations for dealing with core levels. In all GW calculations presented here, G and W are generated from the local-density approximation (LDA), which we denote as the \GLDA\WLDA approximation. To test its range of validity, the \GLDA\WLDA approximation is applied to a variety of materials systems. We show that for simple sp semiconductors, \GLDA\WLDA always underestimates bandgaps; however, better agreement with experiment is obtained when the self-energy is not renormalized, and we propose a justification for it. Some calculations for Si are compared to pseudopotential-based \GLDA\WLDA calculations, and some aspects of the suitability of pseudopotentials for GW calculations are discussed.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.