Paper detail

Addressing the issue of mass conservation error and the connected problem of Carbuncle formation

We study mass conservation errors (momentum density spike) and the related phenomenon of post shock oscillations in numerical solutions of compressible Euler equations. These phenomena and their causes have been reported in literature [34, 1]. In this paper, first, we compare the mass conservation and post shock oscillation errors obtained using combinations of different numerical methods (Finite Volume, Finite Difference with WENO and DG with simple WENO limiter) and upwind flux functions (ROE, AUSM+-up, and others) for moving shocks, modelled using one-dimensional Euler equations. Next, the mass conservation error is quantified for stationary shocks modelled using one-dimensional, quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional Euler equations. It is shown that using a fine mesh or refining mesh near shocks using multiple over set meshes lead to mitigation of the mass conservation error. This is demonstrated using the problem of flow through a variable area duct modelled using quasi-one-dimensional Euler equations. The link between mass conservation error and carbuncle formation is shown and preliminary results indicating that the carbuncle can be cured using multiple overset meshes are also shown.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.