Paper detail

Additional Light Sterile Neutrinos and Cosmology

Tantalizing cosmological and terrestrial evidence suggests the number of light neutrinos may be greater than 3, motivating a careful re-examination of cosmological bounds on extra light species. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constrains the number of relativistic neutrino species present during nucleosynthesis, $N_{eff}^{BBN}$, while measurements of the CMB angular power spectrum constrain the effective energy density in relativistic neutrinos at the time of matter-radiation equality, $N_{eff}^{CMB}$. There are a number of scenarios where new sterile neutrino species may have different contributions to $ΔN_{eff}^{BBN}$ and $ΔN_{eff}^{CMB}$, for masses that may be relevant to reconciling cosmological constraints with various terrestrial claims of neutrino oscillations. We consider a scenario with two sterile neutrinos and explore whether partial thermalization of the sterile states can ease the tension between cosmological constraints on $N_{eff}^{BBN}$ and terrestrial data. We then investigate the effect of a non-zero neutrino mass on their contribution to the radiation abundance, finding reductions in $ΔN_{eff}^{CMB}$ of more than 5% for neutrinos with masses above 0.5 eV. While the effects we investigate here could play a role, we nevertheless find that two additional light sterile neutrinos species cannot fit all the data at the 95% confidence level.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.